Carl Lewis is still running

Even now, with his 48th birthday quickly approaching, Carl Lewis looks like he could go 9.9 in the 100. Heck, on a good day with a nice tailwind and a fast track, Lewis looked as though he might even be able to pull off a 27-footer in the long jump.

No, he didn’t get those nine gold medals and one silver in four different Olympics by accident. Nor was it a mistake when Sports Illustrated named Lewis the greatest U.S. Olympian of the 20th Century.

Clean living
Chalk that up to clean living (Lewis is a vegan and a fitness devotee even though he retired from professional sports after the 1996 Olympics), which is a concept that doesn’t seem to jibe with modern pro sports based on the latest headlines.

Then again, Lewis is all-too familiar with the seamy side of athletics. Actually, he had a front-row seat for a few of sports’ all-time dirtiest moments. Of course none were more notorious than the September day in Seoul, Korea where Lewis ran a time good enough for a new world record in the Olympic finals of 100-meters only to watch as Canadian Ben Johnson ran away from him like he was stuck in the mud.

Three days later Johnson was disqualified when his drug test was tainted with the steroid Winstrol. Coincidentally, Winstrol is the same steroid baseball player Rafael Palmeiro tested positive for in 2005 and is also reported to have been used by Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens during their careers.

So yes, Lewis knows a thing or two about drugs in sports, and, he thinks he has some idea about when an athlete might be using it.

“The reality is that most people are clean,” Lewis, the Willingboro, N.J. native, said following his appearance on Daily News Live. “When you have two out of 100 that’s two percent, but if those two are in the finals, suddenly that’s a very high percentage. And if two win medals, that’s two out of three. That’s [67] percent. Just so quickly it, goes up.”

Continue reading the rest of this story…

Catching up with PEDs

Rafael PalmeiroIt’s been a long time since I wrote about drugs here so I thought I’d start out with a “told you so.” What is this time, you ask. Well, hold on… let me tell you.

It wasn’t too long ago – August of 2005 – when I wrote about how the well-publicized pharmaceutical Viagra was a performance-enhancing drug. And no, that wasn’t meant as a joke.

Actually, most people think I’m being ironic when I say or write that Viagra can heighten the athletic prowess of an athlete, but, please, take the statements at face value. Nevertheless, what piqued my interest in Viagra was the positive drug test from ex-Orioles and Rangers slugger Rafael Palmeiro.

Palmeiro, of course, was suspended by baseball for 10 games for testing positive for the anabolic steroid Winstrol, which reportedly was the drug of choice for shamed sprinter Ben Johnson and stakes horse, Big Brown. But Palmeiro was even better known for his use of Viagra. In fact, Palmeiro famously appeared as a spokesman for the impotency drug and starred in national TV commercials that hit the airwaves in heavy rotation.

So while everyone was trying to figure out if Palmeiro was taking shots of horse steroids in his rear, I dug into what Viagra was doing for him other than what was being explained in the TV commercial.

Viagra, not unlike EPO, I wrote, could increase the level of oxygen sent to an athletes’ muscles. The more oxygen in a muscle, the less tired it gets so it could be said that Palmeiro’s muscles not only were recovering and growing quicker thanks to the horse ‘roids, but also they were getting much more oxygen from his little blue pills. Pretty much any athlete who participates in a sport that involves running or endurance might be able to benefit from taking Viagra.

But Viagra is also used to counteract potential impotence, which can be a side-effect of testosterone injections. At least that’s what we learned from a story in the New York Daily News this week. The crux of the story:

Roger Clemens allegedly kept Viagra in a GNC vitamin bottle in his locker at Yankee Stadium. Already under investigation for alleged performance-enhancing drug use during his playing days, Clemens, sensationally, was allegedly one of many athletes taking “Vitamin V.” according to the story, Barry Bonds, Jason Giambi and Marian Jones were regular users of the drug. What’s more, pro cyclist Andrea Moletta was suspended from the prestigious Giro d’Italia when police found 82 Viagra pills and a syringe in his father’s car.

Sports regulation groups, including the federally-funded United States Anti-Doping Agency, are investigating whether or not Viagra could become a banned substance for athletes. According to drugs expert Don Catlin, “It’s a complicated drug. If you go through the basic pharmacology and stretch your imagination, you could end up saying, ‘Yeah, maybe it could be useful for athletes who are competing in endurance sports at high altitude.'”

But – pardon the pun – Viagra is in bed with Major League Baseball. A long-time corporate sponsor of MLB, it seems as if baseball could find itself in an odd spot. How would it look if MLB came under the drug-testing auspices of the USADA and had to ban a product of one of its major sponsors?

Regardless, will Major league Baseball really test anyone for anything? According to a story in The New York Times, MLB may have suspended drug testing during the 2004 season. Better yet, if the league didn’t suspend testing, the story reads, MLB alerted players when tests would be.The reason why that’s such big news is that the league failed to mention any of this during the infamous testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in March of 2005.

It was during those hearings where Palmeiro wagged his finger at the lawmakers and told them he never used steroids.

Instead, MLB the MLBPA testified in those hearings that test results in 2004 showed a significant drop in positives, which may have stopped Congress from interceding in MLB’s drug testing processes.

In other words, players weren’t testing positive because they weren’t being tested… allegedly.

Harry Waxman, the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, issued a statement in which he says the information he received from MLB and MLBPA was wrong, though he isn’t sure if either group was deliberately supplying the wrong information.

Says Waxman:

It’s clear that some of the information Major League Baseball and the players union gave the committee in 2005 was inaccurate. It isn’t clear whether this was intentional or just reflects confusion over the testing program for 2003 and 2004. In any case, the misinformation is unacceptable.

Because of the sports fans’ drug fatigue, it doesn’t seem as if the new revelations will resonate. However, it doesn’t mean it won’t be a problem for MLB. When the Olympic sports routinely test for performance-enhancing drugs and just as routinely suspend athletes – sometimes without the benefit of due process – baseball looks conspicuous by its absence. No, this doesn’t mean baseball should start some of the Draconian methods used by the World Anti-Doping Agency and its brethren, but it’s remarkable to think about what is banned by other sports but is perfectly legal in baseball.

Including that little blue pill.